|
| Obesity and HER 2 overexpression: a common factor for poor prognosis of breast cancer1Department of Surgery, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, DY1 2HQ, UK 2Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
International Seminars in Surgical Oncology 2008, 5:2doi:10.1186/1477-7800-5-2 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.issoonline.com/content/5/1/2
©
2008 Sellahewa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. AbstractBackgroundBoth obesity and over-expression of HER II are associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer. In vitro experiments suggest that anti-tumour activity of the anti-obesity drug Orlistat is likely to be due to transcriptional suppression of HER II expression. The overexpression of HER II is also positively correlated with other markers of prognosis of breast cancer such as cathepsin expression. HypothesisThe hypothesis we tested was that the obese women with breast cancer might over-express HER II more often than their lean counterparts to account for the poor prognosis. Patients and methodsOne hundred consecutive patients were included in this study. Their body mass indexes were correlated with overexpression of HER II. ResultsThere was also no association between oestrogen or progesterone receptor positivity and obesity or HER II over expression in premenopausal or post-menopausal women with breast cancer. ConclusionThe present study demonstrated that the poor outcome of breast cancer in obese patients is not due to over expression of HER II. IntroductionObesity leads to poor prognosis in women diagnosed with breast cancer even in early stage disease as shown in systematic literature reviews, several large-scale cohort studies and critical reviews such as the Nurse's Health study and cancer prevention study II [1-9]. The women with breast cancer in the highest quartile of BMI are 2.5 times as likely to die of their disease within 5 years of diagnosis compared with women in the lowest quartile of BMI [10]. Recent in vitro experiments suggest that anti-obesity agents Orlistat may have anti-tumour activity which is likely to be due to transcriptional suppression of HER II expression [11]. Orlistat, has potent anti-proliferate and apoptotic effects on breast cancer cells through its ability to block the lipogenic activity of Fatty Acid Synthetase [12]. In vitro experiments also suggest that essential fatty acids such as omega-3 suppress overexpression of HER II at the transcriptional level, which, in turn, interacts synergistically with anti-HER II agents such as Traztuzumab [13]. Traztuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of the tyrosine kinase receptor HER II. Abnormalities of fatty acid metabolism in the development of breast cancer are well documented and the association between Fatty acid metabolism and HER II antagonists is being discovered REF [14]. Therefore, Obesity may be the missing link between the development of breast cancer and over-expression of HER II because of its effect on essential fatty acids These findings suggest a possible association between obesity, abnormal lipid metabolism and an overexpression of HER II. Over-expression of HER II is also associated with a poor prognosis of breast cancer as HER II over-expression playS an important role in the development, aggressive behaviour of breast cancer. Overexpression of HER II has been associated with other markers of poor prognosis of breast cancer such as cathepsin D [15]. The hypothesis we tested was that the obese women with breast cancer over-express HER II more often than their lean counterparts to account for the poor prognosis in obese women. Patients and methodsOne hundred consecutive patients were included in this study. Their height, weight and body mass index were correlated with overexpression of HER II. Laboratory methodsThe criteria of HER II over expression were used as per Pan Birmingham Protocol. The HER II over expression was measured by immunohistochemistry (DAKO)®. The borderline cases were tested with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (Abbott Path Vision)®. Statistical methodsUsing the chi(2)-test, relationships were determined between marker labelling and histological type of cancer, tumour grade, tumour size, axillary lymph node status and age of patient. A p value below 0.05 was considered significant. ResultsAll results are summarised in table 1. Using the BMI categories of less than 25, 25–30, 30–35 and more than 35 kg/m2 there is no significant trend in the proportions who are HER positive or negative within these categories Figure 1. There was also no association between oestrogen or progesterone receptor positivity and obesity or HER II over expression in premenopausal or post-menopausal women with breast cancer, Figure 1 and Table 1.
Table 1. The association between obesity, hormone receptor status and HER II overexpression DiscussionObesity is associated with poor prognosis of breast cancer. The exact mechanism by which obesity affects the outcome of breast cancer is not fully understood. HER II overexpression is associated with poor prognosis of breast caner. The present study demonstrated that the poor outcome of breast cancer in obese patients was not due to overexpression of HER II. The present study is in concordance with another small-scale study that showed no association obesity and erbB-2 expression without the use of Fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) [16]. The present study confirmed that even after FISH analysis there seem to be no association between obesity and HER II expression. These are small-scale studies, and warrant larger scale research. The relationship between obesity and steroid hormone receptors is complex and controversial. Several relationships have been reported and refuted. Our study is in concordance with other reports, which show no reliable association between steroid hormone receptor and obesity in breast cancer patients. References
Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |




on Google Scholar







author email
corresponding author email
Figure 1.